Hello Charles,

To describe the crashes, I'll describe what I do, and subsequently the
crashes.

I have two xplor-scripts (TAD like protocols), who do exactly the same,
only difference is that they use a different parameter set.
So, I run:
xplor < fold1.inp
xplor < fold2.inp

to reproduce the error.
And as things go.... no error occurs.

It must have been the time of the day.
My apologies.... I think it is/was an issue that has to do with my
computer instead of the Xplor-NIH distribution.

Kind regards,
Ramon

On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 10:02 -0400, Charles at Schwieters.org wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> 
> Hello Ramon--
> 
> > I am running Xplor-NIH v2.19.0 on an Intel Core 2 Quad, under Scientific
> > linux. (comparable to RedHat Enterprise)
> > 
> > I found Xplor-NIH uses only a single core, and when I run multiple
> > instances of xplor, it crashes the latest instance of xplor-NIH, whereas
> > the old xplor v3.851 can run multiple instances.
> > 
> 
> what sort of crashes do you see?
> 
> > Is there a way to use multiple cores for one Xplor-NIH process ?
> > And can the problem of multiple instances be fixed ?
> > 
> > I already tried xplor -num_threads 4 ....
> > This did not solve the issue.
> 
> Try 
>   -smp 4 
> this should do exactly what you want.
> 
> best regards--
> Charles
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8+ <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>
> 
> iD8DBQFICKoNPK2zrJwS/lYRAhR1AJ0SBPLRXfKU1Hp9sS/ejfQpXv/RfwCfYgAU
> Xv6bVQKzlsIVrplHTwKdDQI=
> =Px9/
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 

Reply via email to