Hi John,

I want the molecule to do the rotations, since I oriented the helices in
another fashion. Subsequently I introduced an alignment tensor which is
oriented in such a way that helix RDCs are optimized.

Then I introduce the other RDCs, and want that part of the molecule to
find it's orientation matching the current alignment tensor.

For clarity: I am working on a nucleic acid element which consists of
two helices connnected by a joint. This joint part poses the problem.

Kind regards,
Ramon

On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 10:37 -0500, John Kuszewski wrote:
> Hi Ramon,
> 
> Looks like your contraints fix statements are the problem.  By fixing  
> the entire SANI "molecule," you've forced your structure to do all  
> the overall rotations necessary for RDC agreement.  But by fixing  
> parts of your structure as well, you've prevented that.
> 
> Change the first constraints fix selection to (segid SANI and resid  
> 500 and name OO), and get rid of the selections for parts of your  
> protein, and you should be all right.
> 
> But note that you'd be better off using a more modern script, like  
> xplor/eginput/gb1_rdc/refine.py to do this.
> 
> Hope this helps.
> 
> --JK
> 
> On Mar 3, 2008, at 5:12 AM, R.M. van der Werf wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am trying to do a global RDC refinement, but the molecule appears to
> > move very little, or not at all.
> >
> > My script goes as follows (Temperature = 300K over entire script)
> >
> > 1. Read structure, parameters, restraints (NOE, RDCs, dihedrals)
> > 2. Introduce alignment tensor (pseudoatoms)
> > 3. fix helices:
> >  constraint fix=((segid SANI and resid 500)
> >     or (segid EDHB and resid 1:5) or (segid EDHB and resid 33:37) or
> > (segid EDHB and resid 14:29)) end
> >
> > My structure contains 37 residues, RDCs need to be refined for the
> > residues which are not fixed.
> >
> > 4. 4000 verlet dynamic steps of 0.0005 ps with the
> >     flags bonds angle impr vdw noe cdih plan sani
> > 5. Loop of verlet dynamics in which in every loop step the NOE and  
> > cdih
> >      force is increased
> > 6. 20000 verlet dynamic steps of 0.0005 ps, at 'high' force for NOE
> >     and cdih
> > 7. powell minimisation of 10000 steps
> >
> > Any ideas are welcome.
> > Increasing the timesteps moves the final structures to a higher energy
> > level (and thus not ending up in an energetic minimum).
> > Is another temperature needed ?
> >
> > Kind regards,
> > Ramon
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Xplor-nih mailing list
> > Xplor-nih at nmr.cit.nih.gov
> > http://dcb.cit.nih.gov/mailman/listinfo/xplor-nih
> 

Reply via email to