Hi Gary--

  This service may be helpful in this case- I encourage users to try
it out.

Charles

On Tue, 04 Jun 2024 11:32:31 -0400,
Gary Thompson wrote:
> 
> [1  <text/plain; utf-8 (base64)>]
> [2  <text/html; utf-8 (base64)>]
> Hi Charles 
> 
> Would https://atb.uq.edu.au/ help you here, I am planning to do similar things
> and was planning to use it…
> 
> regards
> Gary
> 
> Dr Gary S Thompson NMR Facility Manager
> CCPN CoI & Working Group Member
> Wellcome Trust Biomolecular NMR Facility  
> School of Biosciences,  Division of Natural Sciences 
> University of Kent,  Canterbury,  Kent,  England,  CT2 7NZ  
>  
> ☎:01227 82 7117  
> ✉️: [email protected]
> orchid: orcid.org/0000-0001-9399-7636
> 
>     On 4 Jun 2024, at 16:28, Charles Schwieters <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
>     CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organisation. Do not
>     click links or open attachments unless you recognise the sender and know
>     the content is safe.
> 
>     Hello Suze Ma--
> 
>         1. I intend to calculate the solution 3D structures of two peptide
>         macrocycles based on their 1H-1H NOESY data. The first one contains
>         an ether crosslink (from an exogenous oxygen atom) inserted between
>         the Trp1-C7 and the Phe3-Cβ while the second one contains a
>         carbon-carbon crosslink derived from Trp1-C7 and Lys3-Cβ. (for both
>         structures, see ref:
>         
> https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdoi.org%2F10.1021%2Fjacs.3c04355&data=05%7C02%7CG.S.Thompson%40kent.ac.uk%7C004d4f2097b34693a64808dc84ab194b%7C51a9fa563f32449aa7213e3f49aa5e9a%7C0%7C0%7C638531117717912748%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=6NlDB%2FwAT6jU1%2FZjG3b%2BfY9OyFKFbFJJUkrsoq02mxs%3D&reserved=0).
>         I am
>         wondering if there are patches to add these two types of
>         modifications to the structures. I guess addAtom.py is not suitable
>         for these cases. In addition, I am not sure how to generate the
>         parameters (e.g. bond, angle, etc) associated with these
>         intramolecular crosslinks (I understand that the original protein
>         topology file, e.g. protein-1.0.top, does not contain such
>         information).
> 
>     You will need patches along the lines of those used in
>     eginput/PSF_generation/gen*CircPep.py in the Xplor-NIH distribution.
>     I can help with the required patches. But particularly for the ether
>     case, parameters are required - we might borrow those of anisole, if
>     you can find the atomic coordinates of that molecule. For the
>     carbon-carbon crosslink, we can make a decent educated guess.
> 
>         2. To generate distance restraints, I use sparky to assign the NOESY
>         spectrum and obtain the intensity of NOE signals, which, upon
>         calibrated by a known interprotein distance (e.g. Thr-HA to Thr-HN,
>         2.51 angstrom) and its NOE intensity in my spectrum, only results in
>         a single list of distances, referred to as d. However, I'm not sure
>         how to generate the dminus and dplus to define the distance
>         restraint bounds (d-dminus, d-dplus). I know there are other
>         methods, such as MARDIGRAS, to generate the bounds. However, I don't
>         find an available access to these algorithms. Thus, I am asking if
>         there are other methods to overcome or circumvent the problem in
>         generating distance restraints bounds for calculations?
> 
>     Usually, the intensity-derived distances are rather qualitative, so
>     that distance bounds would be at least +/- 1 Angstrom, so unless you
>     know otherwise, you might use this value.
> 
>         3. I am wondering is it possible to only rely on the NOE restraints
>         (and not dihedral restraints or others) to model the structures of
>         the small peptide macrocycles in my case? If it is theoretically
>         feasible, how to calculate only with distance restraints and not
>         other restraints by using fold.py, anneal.py, etc? Simply by
>         deleting the contents regarding other restraints while only
>         maintaining the contents regarding distance restraints?
> 
>     Of course, more data is better, but distance-only information can be
>     used by commenting-out or removing sections of the scripts which
>     involve other restraints.
> 
>     best regards--
>     Charles
> 
>     ########################################################################
> 
>     To unsubscribe from the XPLOR-NIH list, click the following link:
>     Bad URL Removed - see why -
>     
> https://ees.sps.nih.gov/services/Pages/Anti-Virus.aspx%3FSUBED1%3DXPLOR-NIH%26A%3D1&data=05%7C02%7CG.S.Thompson%40kent.ac.uk%7C004d4f2097b34693a64808dc84ab194b%7C51a9fa563f32449aa7213e3f49aa5e9a%7C0%7C0%7C638531117717923308%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=ZjQCxbbsn0uyB9o2F%2FAH5%2F9g7z88Bk45cBsd0mgb1lA%3D&reserved=0
>     
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> To unsubscribe from the XPLOR-NIH list, click the following link:
> Bad URL Removed - see why - 
> https://ees.sps.nih.gov/services/Pages/Anti-Virus.aspx?SUBED1=XPLOR-NIH&A=1 

########################################################################

To unsubscribe from the XPLOR-NIH list, click the following link:
http://list.nih.gov/cgi-bin/wa.exe?SUBED1=XPLOR-NIH&A=1

Reply via email to