"William M. Brack" wrote:
> two different kinds of "extension elements". The "function"
> element is what is sometimes called a "top-level" (i.e. may
> only appear as a child of the stylesheet, and not within a
> template) element. In xslt terminology, this means it is *not*
> an extension element (which can only be within a template).
> This subject has been discussed at length on various mailing
> lists, and I have absolutely no interest in getting involved
> with it :-). I will only conclude by noting that the fact it
> doesn't appear within the "Registered Extension Elements" is
> not a bug, but rather by design.
Ok, I understand now. Thanks for the explanation. Personnaly
I think it's a little disturbing when having problem with
'func:function' to not see it in the '--dumpextensions' output.
Maybe the top-level extension elements ("extension" by
functionality, not by definition) can be displayed separately in
the '--dumpextensions' output.
Thanks for your help,
--drkm
___________________________________________________________________________
Appel audio GRATUIT partout dans le monde avec le nouveau Yahoo! Messenger
Téléchargez cette version sur http://fr.messenger.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
xslt mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/XSLT/
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xslt
