On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 01:25:54PM -0600, Albert Chin wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 12:11:18PM -0500, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 10:40:26AM -0600, Albert Chin wrote:
> > > Any ideas on this test failure (works ok on RHEL 4/AMD64):
Sorry for the delay, I'm now back at the workbench :-)
> > Hum, hard ... we have our own date/time routines based on the
> > XSD ones. Recompiling date.c in libexslt/ with DEBUG_EXSLT_DATE defined
> > and testing on both systems may give a hint of what is going wrong.
>
> Ok, patch below. Does ANSI define bit types as signed/unsigned? I
> think they're unsigned by default. I'd suggest making all bittypes
> signed or unsigned explicitly.
Hum, apparently this was already found and fixed in the libxml2 version,
but the field is a bit wider:
xmlschemastypes.c line 69:
------------
signed int tzo :12; /* -1440 <= tzo <= 1440;
currently only -840 to +840 are
needed */
------------
It's probably a safe bet that the width need to be extended a bit.
So patch applied but with extension of the size to 12 bits.
thanks a lot,
Daniel
--
Daniel Veillard | Red Hat http://redhat.com/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
_______________________________________________
xslt mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/XSLT/
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xslt
