On 2005-12-13 18:43:47 -0500, Joel E. Denny wrote: > On Tue, 13 Dec 2005, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > On 2005-12-13 16:05:07 -0500, Joel E. Denny wrote: > > > On Tue, 13 Dec 2005, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > > > Unless there's a way, through an extension, to access the RTF in > > > > another way, e.g. with document(). > > > > > > You're referring to exslt:document, right? > > > > Well, it does what I was suggesting, but this will lead to an > > unnecessary linearization. > > Did you have something else in mind?
No, it was just a suggestion in case such features existed in EXSLT, but I've never used them and I don't remember what EXSLT provides exactly. > I'm making the assumption that 2.0 processors don't usually support EXSLT. > Is that right? I don't know. I don't even know any 2.0 processor. > Forgetting extensions for a moment, a few emails back you suggested > multiple passes with an XSLT 1.0 processor. Each pass could produce > XML-encoded sets of data off of which the next pass could construct keys. > Although exslt:document might add some convenience to this approach, it > wouldn't be necessary. This seems like a straight-forward pure XSLT 1.0 > alternative to keys referencing keys. I was suggesting some extension for that to avoid linearization and parsing (if possible). But if you can use an API to avoid that, then this may be fine. -- Vincent Lefèvre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.org/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.org/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / SPACES project at LORIA _______________________________________________ xslt mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/XSLT/ [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xslt
