hi!

Yes you are right! That is why I did not directly suggest to send the data 
but for thr suggestion of  Jeroen.

Thank you all for your suggestions anyway. I will take the newer version in 
my task list and perhaps return to the issue if I see reson at some later 
time. I have "misused" some of the XSLT 1.1 specific features that may work 
differently in newer version that I need to test too.

regards
Kaarle

>
>  Before getting anybody to work on your specific data you really must
> rebuild with the latest versions. There is absolutely no point in spending
> lot of efforts on very old code, a lot of big bottleneck have been removed 
> in
> the last years, and running an opaque binay using very old code is useless
> frankly.
>
> Daniel
>
> -- 
> Red Hat Virtualization group http://redhat.com/virtualization/
> Daniel Veillard      | virtualization library  http://libvirt.org/
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]  | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
> http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine  http://rpmfind.net/
> _______________________________________________
> xslt mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/XSLT/
> [email protected]
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xslt
> 

_______________________________________________
xslt mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/XSLT/
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xslt

Reply via email to