On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 09:29:32AM +0100, Ralf Junker wrote: > On 07.03.2011 05:25, Daniel Veillard wrote: > > > I believe any libxslt compiled without XSLT_REFACTORED leacked this for > > xsl:number. > > Yes, apparently so. > > But with XSLT_REFACTORED defined, compilation fails in preproc.c around > line 423. This makes me wonder if XSLT_REFACTORED is the recommended > setting? Is it any faster / more stable / better tested?
I don't think so. It was basically Kasimier Buchcik and we never finished it nor made it the default :-\ This may be the reason why it breaks now. > > I also reran "make valgrind" and it seems fine now... > > Fine here too, no more leaks with the latest changes. okay, good > > BTW your libxnlt is compiled with memory debug in the logs, not sure > > you want that setup all the time :-) > > I know. Memory debug is required to show the memory leak trace. It is > turned off for production. Anyway, thanks for pointing it out! it was just in case :-) Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ [email protected] | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/ _______________________________________________ xslt mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/XSLT/ [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xslt
