> >> (what about a --xmlfileparam for xsltproc ?) > > I'd suggest to pass a filename as normal parameter and use the > `document` function to read the XML document.
Definitely. I wonder how I sometime can write such nonsense. > This sounds useful, but the big question is which regex flavor to use. > The EXSLT spec vaguely mentions "Javascript regular expression syntax" > without a specific version or standard document. IMO, it makes more > sense to reuse the regex implementation of libxml2 which seems to be > based on XML Schema and should be more aligned with XPath 2.0. Thanks. I didn't know for libxml2's own regex. I'll give a try. Edouard _______________________________________________ xslt mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/XSLT/ [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xslt
