Hi Alain
Sorry that was my mistake, the errors were coming from exsltforms and not
xsltforms.
Gordon
From: Alain Couthures [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: 29 November 2011 20:31
To: Gordon Rogers
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Xsltforms-support] Using insert where both source and destination
contain bindings
Hi Gordon,
Rev. 520 xsltforms.js doesn't contain any Core.<method>... Did you really
upgrade to it??
-Alain
Le 29/11/2011 14:59, Gordon Rogers a écrit :
Hi Alain
Thanks for the prompt feedback, I'm in the process of upgrading my version of
xsltforms and it does indeed solve this bug. In passing I noticed a few places
in xsltforms.js where you're still using Core.<method> rather than
XsltForms_browser.<method>, I can't contribute the changes I've made
unfortunately as we've added some custom code in places within the js file so
it wouldn't be compatible.
Thanks,
Gordon
From: Alain Couthures [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: 26 November 2011 21:26
To: Gordon Rogers
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Xsltforms-support] Using insert where both source and destination
contain bindings
Hi Gordon,
I didn't get any error with the latest trunk revision in the SF SVN repository
(this is not yet the 1.0RC but it's close to it!).
Thank you for your feedbacks!
-Alain
Le 25/11/2011 10:43, Gordon Rogers a écrit :
Hi
I've recently upgraded my version of xsltforms to the latest release and have
started to receive the error message - "Two binds affect one node ..." this is
thrown from within XFBind.prototype.refresh and occurs when I'm doing an
xf:insert with bindings in place for both the source and the destination. The
insert appears to work regardless of the error message being thrown, so I'm not
sure of the value in making the validation check.
I've attached a simple example that recreates the error and is based on the
deep-copy.xml example distributed with xsltforms.js.
Is there an obvious fix to this problem? My initial thought was to remove the
validation check locally, but I'm not sure of the underlying reason for
introducing that check. Is a repeat a special case where the check has no
meaning?
Thanks,
Gordon
Gordon Rogers
Senior Developer
Corelogic Limited
www.corelogic.co.uk <http://www.corelogic.co.uk/>
Tel: 0131 550 0447
Email [email protected]
This document should only be read by those persons to whom it is intended, and
its contents are private and confidential. If you receive this email message in
error, notify the sender immediately and do not disclose, copy or distribute
this message, or open any attachments
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure
contains a definitive record of customers, application performance,
security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this
data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d
_______________________________________________
Xsltforms-support mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xsltforms-support
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure
contains a definitive record of customers, application performance,
security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this
data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d
_______________________________________________
Xsltforms-support mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xsltforms-support
