Hello Adam, This should work because XSLTForms supports xs:simpleType and successive restrictions. This sounds more like a prefix issue.
Could you please send me a minimal testcase? Thanks! -Alain Le 01/07/2013 23:51, Adam McKee a écrit : > Hi Alain & everyone, > > I've found XSLTForms 576 does not appreciate an XML Schema that > specializes its own SimpleType. > > For example, if my schema defines this simple type: > > <xs:simpleType name="nonEmptyString"> > <xs:restriction base="xs:string"> > <xs:minLength value="1"/> > <xs:pattern value="\S+(.*\S+)?"/> > </xs:restriction> > </xs:simpleType> > > ... and then specializes it to create another simple type: > > <xs:simpleType name="string100"> > <xs:restriction base="myns:nonEmptyString"> > <xs:maxLength value="100"/> > </xs:restriction> > </xs:simpleType> > > ... then XSLTForms will not accept the schema. It complains: > > "Schema for namespace undefined not defined for type nonEmptyString" > > The schema is valid. If I load it into <oXygen/> editor for example, > it correctly understands the "string100" type. > > I can work around this by making the "string100" type a specialization > of "xs:string", and repeating in the "string100" type all the > constraints that are specified for the "nonEmptyString" type. > > What do you make of this? > > Thanks! > > -Adam > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: > > Build for Windows Store. > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Xsltforms-support mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xsltforms-support > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Xsltforms-support mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xsltforms-support
