At 5:59 PM +0200 on 6/18/99, M. Uli Kusterer wrote: > I have to admit that re-reading this I don't get what the interpreter >would do when I say delimiter "a", "b" or "c" ??? Three delimiters at >once??? Huh? put item 3 (delim="/" or ":" or "\") of "hello:cruel/world\!" would be 3. (If you want an existing example, think about what a "word" is) > What's so painful about multi-character delimiters? OK, you need to >account for more than a single char, but it isn't really a problem, right? It's a lot slower.
- Re: xTalk: Re: UFP: Delimiters: A new (better, IMO) idea Anonymous
- Re: xTalk: Re: UFP: Delimiters: A new (better, IMO) idea Anonymous
- Re: Re: xTalk: Re: UFP: Delimiters: A new (better, IMO) ide... Anonymous
- Re: Re: xTalk: Re: UFP: Delimiters: A new (better, IMO) ide... Anonymous
- Re: Re: xTalk: Re: UFP: Delimiters: A new (better, IMO) ide... Anonymous
- Re: Re: Re: xTalk: Re: UFP: Delimiters: A new (better, IMO)... Anonymous
- Re: Re: xTalk: Re: UFP: Delimiters: A new (better, IMO) ide... Anonymous
- Re: Re: xTalk: Re: UFP: Delimiters: A new (better, IMO) ide... Anonymous
