Re: xTalk: indirect object references

[DeRobertis]

At 12:53 PM -0600 on 7/17/99, Scott Raney wrote:

>It might also be possible to do it by adding a new chunk type "object"
>that implies a dereference:
>put "button 1" into X
>put "whatever" into object X
>
>But the latter could get hairy to implement:
>put "whatever" into object X of stack "somestack"

I can't think of anything better than object... but it could get hairy, as
you said.