At 22:13 Uhr -0700 30.09.1999, Karl Becker wrote:
>get "player"& whichPlayerToDealTo &"Hand"
>put the value of it into quickHand
>
>However, there must be a better way than this. All those "get blahblah"s
>are annoying. Even worse, I can't put the value of quickLoc back into
>playerXLoc, since something like the following does not work:
>
>get "player"& whichPlayerToDealTo &"Hand"
>put quickHand into it
But the following does:
do "put quickHand into "&it
>So... what about some kind of indirection operator? I know this elevates
>part of the scripting language to a very complex level... but... it WOULD
>be useful, you must admit!
It would be useful only in the sense that there are some people that
would use it. But there are better solutions, arrays and control
properties being those that already exist. Custom classes would be
the solution that I'd ask for.
Regards
R�diger
--------------------------------------------------------------------
| Ruediger zu Dohna GINIT GmbH 0721-96681-63 [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| PGP-Fingerprint: F1 BF 9D 95 57 26 48 42 FE F8 E8 02 41 1A EE 3E |
--------------------------------------------------------------------
