Masatake YAMATO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I agree anarchic approach is interesting. I feel common ChangeLog is
> needed in our approach. Or we have to run dired or C-x C-x in {arch}/
> directory to know the intent of Changes.
What is C-x C-x on your emacs?
Here I get:
,----[ C-h k C-x C-x ]
| C-x C-x runs the command cua-exchange-point-and-mark
| which is an interactive compiled Lisp function in `cua-base'.
| It is bound to C-x C-x.
| (cua-exchange-point-and-mark arg)
|
| Exchanges point and mark, but don't activate the mark.
| Activates the mark if a prefix argument is given.
`----
Now every contributer has its own tree and its own different changelog.
If you use tla log-for-merge you add the descriptions of all changes
to your changelog.
Do you think, that is not enough?
I don't like the idea of an aditional ChangeLog file.
We could add a way to display the patchset information for a merged
patch from within the tla-changelog buffer.
Consider the following entry in from my changelog:
2004-06-06 19:25:05 GMT Stefan Reichoer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> patch-60
Summary:
Merged from Matthieu (patch228-276), Robert (patch92-93), Masatake
(patch114-142)
Revision:
xtla--main--0.1--patch-60
Patches applied:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Merged from Robert (patch87-91), Milan (patch21-22), Stefan (patch58-22)
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Improved prompting mechanism
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Renamed tla-archive-tree -> tla--archive-tree
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Moved the archive-tree manipulators to xtla-core.el
We could provide a way to display the diffs and the logs for that
merged patches.
Stefan.
