On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 07:13:31PM -0800, Gerald Bauer wrote :
> Any comments?
It seems really to be one of the next "big things" from microsoft.
I'm probably biased, but I would have prefered the separate style
from content approach similiar to XUL. The way XAML is desribed at
MSDN it definitely does not work this way.
If I read the XML dialect it reads more like a it was written to be
a decriptive language to be directly-to converted to any of the new
managed Microsoft flavours, be it C#, JScript, etc. Which makes
sense -- in the Microsoft-Way. XAML is targetting at developers
familiar with their technology; you don't need to have an idea about
CSS or Javascript at all: which however is the targeted developer
audience of XUL.
- Markus
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: The SF.net Donation Program.
Do you like what SourceForge.net is doing for the Open
Source Community? Make a contribution, and help us add new
features and functionality. Click here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
_______________________________________________
xul-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xul-talk
