Both of you, Please read this:
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#IfLibraryIsGPL </flame-match status="end"> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ----- To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Charles Goodwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 04/11/2004 05:12PM Subject: RE: [xul-talk] Because victory wasn't achievable to begin with On Sun, 2004-04-11 at 19:59 -0400, Marc Clifton wrote: > Sigh. > > >From the GPL: > > " 3. You may copy and distribute the Program (or a work based on it At what part of that does it apply to developing an XUL application on top of an XUL motor? An XUL application is not work based on an XUL motor, but work using an XUL motor. If you read the small print you'll see there is a difference. The GPL license of an XUL motor implies nothing to the license of the XUL application in the same way that just because you write an application that runs on Linux you do not have to GPL said application. Wake up. You're in a land of noo naa. Emailing in your sleep. > And frankly, I consider myself a lot more intelligent than most lawyers You may be intelligent but you do not understand the GPL. But, hey, you think I'm a moron. Fine... email RMS stating your legal opinion on how the GPL affects applications. He'll personally set you straight on the matter. -- - Charlie Charles Goodwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Online @ www.charlietech.com ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click _______________________________________________ xul-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xul-talkNHS^隊X'uS+l.)ۭޱy zThm'^֧t!:(!h'-櫝ޯ+ax wZj[-̬vhkjبmv,vw(xF"w~\'$mjY&j)b bn֥X( ~zwilqzlX)ߣn֥
