Hello, I've posted the XUL Compact Syntax Study online that explores four non-XML syntax alternatives (that is, C style, Python style, Lisp style, Pascal style) hoping to make the XUL syntax more compact and more accesible to newcomers who mighty shy away from the "complexity" of XML.
Let us know what you think. Is XML too hard for mere mortals? Are the alternative syntax styles any better? More @ http://xul.sourceforge.net/compact.html - Gerald ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click _______________________________________________ xul-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xul-talk
