Hi, In regards to; http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=2842 http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=3582
I am sorry, but what does it take to get a bug fixed ? I have provided ample amount of info on a *very* common chipset quite some time ago. The first report was filed way back in 2008-08-11. Without these fixed my Solaris desktop is next to useless ! I sometimes have to wait for min for desktop items to start to respond again and its nothing to do with XAA/EXA as far as I can see. I have used tried Mesa 7.0.3 and the new Intel drivers to no effect. More details in report. I feel I have been fairly patient but things such as a newer version of Pidgin or Gnome or whatever seems to keep getting higher priority then bug reports such as the ones above. As both a user and a member of the community I would like to know why Sun persistence in having a new version of Gnome as a higher priority then a working X server and stable/workable drivers? Thanks, Edward O'Callaghan. -- All Documents adhered to the ISO/IEC 26300 standard file format for electronic office documents, such as spreadsheets, charts, presentations and word processing documents from this email address. The author does not take responsibility of the recipients inability to read international standards and who use proprietary products such as MS Office. See: http://www.openoffice.org/ Edward O'Callaghan. edwardoc_AT_BlastWave_(.)_Org -- http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EdwardOcallaghan http://moonshine.opn4.org/ http://www.pcbsd.org/
