On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 11:36 PM, Alan Coopersmith <Alan.Coopersmith at sun.com> wrote: > Martin Bochnig wrote: >> Until the "we don't integrate your SPARC-Xorg patches" thing. > [...] >> It was "work in progress" (SPARC-1.5.x move and also xcb) until you >> informed me about not having any plans to use my contributions. > > This thread is getting pointless, but just because it seems you might > not understand me -
Ever tried to understand me? > when I said that we haven't made plans yet, I didn't > mean it would never happen, was not going to happen, was planned not to > happen, or anything like that. This sounds much better (and a bit different). Indeed, I did not understand you. Because it was - at the minimum - ambiguous. Maybe "Lost in translation."? Mhhh, may-be. Although your examples with Belenix and Nextenda didn't suggest it was only a misunderstanding. In this pretext I would be willing to continue the merge of my legacy-SPARC patches into your group's 1.5.2 gate as planned, but before I do the push, it first needs to function (with the upgraded libpciaccess) on at least some of my test systems. I can only do it in my spare time, because of my new job as Java-developer. But as it would be a pity to throw everything away I will continue with it. Martin Bochnig C, C++ && Java > -- > -Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersmith at sun.com > Sun Microsystems, Inc. - X Window System Engineering > >
