> > Now that there is a 6 byte chunkHeader, could the 1 byte tempBuf be > > removed? > > It's better to keep it. It would be confusing to use the same buffer in > write(int) and writeChunk(). At glance it would look like that > writeChunk() could be overwriting the input.
I assumed that lz.fillWindow(buf, off, len); would always process the 1 byte. It is not a big deal, I am just trying to understand what is going on a bit better. Brett
