On 06/19/2018 10:51 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > The file creation time in the inode uses time_t which is defined differently > on 32-bit and 64-bit architectures and deprecated. The representation in > the inode uses an unsigned 32-bit number, but this gets wrapped around > after year 2038 when assigned to a time_t. > > This changes the type to time64_t, so we can support the full range of > timestamps between 1970 and 2106 on 32-bit systems like we do on 64-bit > systems already, and matching what we do for the atime/ctime/mtime stamps > since the introduction of 64-bit timestamps in VFS. > > Note: the otime stamp is not actually used anywhere at the moment in > the kernel, it is just set when writing a file, so none of this really > makes a difference unless we implement setting the btime field in the > getattr() callback.
This looks good to me. I'll push it to linux-next and target the next merge window. Thanks, Shaggy > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]> > --- > fs/jfs/jfs_incore.h | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/fs/jfs/jfs_incore.h b/fs/jfs/jfs_incore.h > index 1f26d1910409..d5c46f86b2ef 100644 > --- a/fs/jfs/jfs_incore.h > +++ b/fs/jfs/jfs_incore.h > @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ struct jfs_inode_info { > pxd_t ixpxd; /* inode extent descriptor */ > dxd_t acl; /* dxd describing acl */ > dxd_t ea; /* dxd describing ea */ > - time_t otime; /* time created */ > + time64_t otime; /* time created */ > uint next_index; /* next available directory entry index */ > int acltype; /* Type of ACL */ > short btorder; /* access order */ > _______________________________________________ Y2038 mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/y2038
