Hi Russell, On 10/25/19 8:28 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote: > On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 08:17:36PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux admin > wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 01:47:24PM +0100, Vincenzo Frascino wrote: >>> Hi Arnd, >>> >>> On 10/24/19 1:34 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >>>> Hi Vinvenzo, >>>> >>>> I'm looking through some of the remaining y2038 work, and noticed >>>> that arch/arm64 has the new generic vdso implementation, but arch/arm >>>> does. >>>> >>> >>> This is correct, arch/arm does not have support for the generic vDSO >>> library. >>> >>>> Do you patches for using the same code on arch/arm? >>>> >>> >>> The patches were send for review together with the arm64 ones and the rest >>> of >>> the architectures supported but they did not get merged yet and I do not >>> know why. >> >> I think you've forgotten, you didn't read the email from the patch >> system, or the "Regression in 5.3-rc1 and later" email thread on the >> mailing lists. >> >> https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/viewpatch.php?id=8868/1 >> >> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/ >> >> Basically, I couldn't merge for the last merge window without causing >> a regression, so it's delayed until the next merge window. > > Okay, having discussed with Arnd what the current situation is, he > points out that he needs an additional patch to solve some further > build issues with the generic VDSO patches - caused by the Kconfig > changes in your first patch. > > I'd rather that gets fixed up before I apply the patches, rather > than applying a set of patches and a fix on top. > > Please re-spin with Arnd's Kconfig changes included. >
No problem, I will re-spin the patches. > Thanks. > -- Regards, Vincenzo _______________________________________________ Y2038 mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/y2038
