On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 7:21 PM Steve McIntyre <st...@einval.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 01:52:00PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >* Adding a time64 armhf as a separate (incompatible) target in glibc
> > that defines __TIMESIZE==64 and a 64-bit __time_t would avoid
> > most of the remaining ABI issues and put armhf-time64 in the same
> > category as riscv32 and arc, but this idea was so far rejected by the
> > glibc maintainers. Depending on how hard this turns out to be,
> > it could be used to get to the point of self-hosting though, and
> > help find time64 related bugs in the rest of the distro.
>
> OK. I'm thinking it's probably not worth it?
This depends on the timeline of Lukasz' work. My feeling is that there is still
quite a bit to be done before it's worth trying the Debian bootstrap again.
If you or someone else wants to continue where I stopped with the Debian
rebuilding without waiting for the complete glibc port, adding a new armhf
target to glibc on top of the current glibc-y2038 tree is probably a quicker
way to get something that builds and boots. I don't know how much work
exactly there would be for this approach, but my feeling is that it's not that
much after looking at the kind of problems I ran into, and at the state of
the riscv32 port that uses the same approach.
Arnd
_______________________________________________
Y2038 mailing list
Y2038@lists.linaro.org
https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/y2038
