On Wed, 06 Oct 2021 19:49:17 +0200,
Michael Forney wrote:
>
> Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de> wrote:
> > +#if defined(__BYTE_ORDER) ? __BYTE_ORDER == __BIG_ENDIAN :
> > defined(__BIG_ENDIAN)
> > +typedef char __pad_before_uframe[sizeof(__u64) -
> > sizeof(snd_pcm_uframes_t)];
> > +typedef char __pad_after_uframe[0];
> > +#endif
> > +
> > +#if defined(__BYTE_ORDER) ? __BYTE_ORDER == __LITTLE_ENDIAN :
> > defined(__LITTLE_ENDIAN)
> > +typedef char __pad_before_uframe[0];
> > +typedef char __pad_after_uframe[sizeof(__u64) - sizeof(snd_pcm_uframes_t)];
> > +#endif
> > +
> > +struct __snd_pcm_mmap_status64 {
> > + __s32 state; /* RO: state - SNDRV_PCM_STATE_XXXX */
> > + __u32 pad1; /* Needed for 64 bit alignment */
> > + __pad_before_uframe __pad1;
> > + snd_pcm_uframes_t hw_ptr; /* RO: hw ptr (0...boundary-1) */
> > + __pad_after_uframe __pad2;
> > + struct __snd_timespec64 tstamp; /* Timestamp */
> > + __s32 suspended_state; /* RO: suspended stream state */
> > + __u32 pad3; /* Needed for 64 bit alignment */
> > + struct __snd_timespec64 audio_tstamp; /* sample counter or wall clock */
> > +};
> > +
> > +struct __snd_pcm_mmap_control64 {
> > + __pad_before_uframe __pad1;
> > + snd_pcm_uframes_t appl_ptr; /* RW: appl ptr (0...boundary-1) */
> > + __pad_before_uframe __pad2;
>
> I was looking through this header and happened to notice that this
> padding is wrong. I believe it should be __pad_after_uframe here.
>
> I'm not sure of the implications of this typo, but I suspect it
> breaks something on 32-bit systems with 64-bit time (regardless of
> the endianness, since it changes the offset of avail_min).
Right, that's the expected breakage. It seems that the 64bit time on
32bit arch is still rare, so we haven't heard a regression by that, so
far...
In anyway, care to send a formal fix patch?
Thanks for catching this!
Takashi
_______________________________________________
Y2038 mailing list
Y2038@lists.linaro.org
https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/y2038
