> - code.google.com (because it is most reliable and has the best uptime) > - sf.net (because everyone uses it) > - launchpad.net (Vaclav: because why?) Because it has excellent tracking capabilities (bug tracker, feature tracker, release tracker, wiki, etc. - ubuntu uses it, BTW). Second, it provides bzr hosting which I though about as alternative to svn. Third, it is commerically backed by canonical. OTOH, there is no homepage/database/wiki etc services, it has to be provided elsewhere.
> Speaking about revision control system I'd prefer to stay with SVN. > Dunno why, maybe simply because I'm accustomed to it? My first impulse was moving files. Bzr is very similar to svn, but has the advantage that you can have your own local brach: you commit locally and can always revert changes etc, then, once the result is OK, the commit to the cetral repo can be done. But, well, I am fine with svn. Once we are at it, creating some sort of wiki seems vital to me. For the moment, I have everything local or somewhere else, but perhaps other people would write a bit to help others, too. V. _______________________________________________ yade-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/yade-dev
