> > (Another dicussion would be if the classes should still be renamed, > > I don't think the proposal is good. But that's for later.) > > it's in the highly-ranked journals already. Too late :P
Lame argument. I don't want to get into that because I think yade has been stagnating functionality-wise for quite long, while piling up bunch of duplicated low-quality code without any documentation; debating class names is really secondary for me, as much as it is boring. If you want to conserve yade as you described it in your papers few years back, go ahead, but don't count on me (not speaking of others, though). V. _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp _______________________________________________ yade-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/yade-dev
