Let me say just a couple of words like a "third-side". I think YADE has more important things to be focused on instead of renaming classes. For example lack of documentation. I do it as I can, but my YADE knowledges are not so good yet.
PS Janek, you can write a good documentation! I saw your papers! ______________________________ [ENG] Best Regards [GER] Mit freundlichen Grüßen [RUS] С наилучшими пожеланиями [UKR] З найкращими побажаннями Anton Gladkyy 2009/8/17 Václav Šmilauer <[email protected]> > > > (Another dicussion would be if the classes should still be renamed, > > > I don't think the proposal is good. But that's for later.) > > > > it's in the highly-ranked journals already. Too late :P > > Lame argument. > > I don't want to get into that because I think yade has been stagnating > functionality-wise for quite long, while piling up bunch of duplicated > low-quality code without any documentation; debating class names is > really secondary for me, as much as it is boring. > > If you want to conserve yade as you described it in your papers few > years back, go ahead, but don't count on me (not speaking of others, > though). > > V. > > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: > https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev<https://launchpad.net/%7Eyade-dev> > Post to : [email protected] > Unsubscribe : > https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev<https://launchpad.net/%7Eyade-dev> > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
