On 03/07/15 12:00, Anton Gladky wrote: > 2015-07-03 9:26 GMT+02:00 Bruno Chareyre <bruno.chare...@3sr-grenoble.fr>: >>> I am just thinking, that we should probably deprecate this >>> functionality, because it usually brings only problems. >> Deprecating save()?! > I was thinking about implementing something more simple to save > simulations. For example, only bodies, velocities and maybe interactions. > Thus it could be more portable. AFAIK such a scheme is in LAMMPS. Why not but it will not replace the current save() for resuming simulations as if they were not interrupted. Without proper engines, a list of bodies and interactions is useless. B
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev Post to : yade-dev@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
