Bruno Chareyre said: (by the date of Mon, 7 Jan 2019 16:59:53 +0100) > Daily builds would be based on the develop branch.
good, that answer my question from other mail. > > (by the way, with a tighter control on development, would we still > > need a distinction between "yade" and "yadedaily" packages ?..) > > Yade is stable release, not updated very often, included in main > debian/ubuntu repos. > Yadedaily is updated more than daily, after each change to the source > code, not included in debian/ubuntu repos. > They are very different things and I think we need both. agreed. > > Also, with "develop" and "master", I guess any proposal for code > > modification would have to be closely examined and validated twice : > > - once to make it into "develop" > > - and once, to make it from "develop" into "master" > > ?... > There is no reason to check the develop->master merge if everything in > develop is already validated by regtests + human review. > Our github/master corresponds to "develop" more or less. > Merging develop into master in the new model would correspond to Anton > calling for update and releasing 2018.b. More or less. agred. > We probably need a liberal, truly unstable repo on the top of this, at > least in a transitory phase, so that everyone can play with gitlab a bit > and break everything with no limit. For instance to compare --no-ff, > --only-ff, and other variants. how about calling it experimental ? :-)) And yes, we definitely need something like that. Where git reset --hard is nothing to be afraid of. -- Janek Kozicki _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev Post to : yade-dev@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp