Question #675377 on Yade changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/675377
Chareyre posted a new comment: Yes and no... the question is actually confusing me. Resetting trsf is probably a good idea but I would suggest to step back: there is no need to consider small strain increments at all, whatever the reference configuration. maxStrainRate is not speaking of small strains, nor is triax.strain (it is natural strain). It seems to me that you created an artificial problem. What is the objective? Bruno Le 24 oct. 2018 18:16, "Mehdi Pouragha" < question675...@answers.launchpad.net> a écrit : Question #675377 on Yade changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/675377 Mehdi Pouragha posted a new comment: So the right way of measuring small strains is to reset the O.cell.trsf to identity and use O.cell.getSmallStrain() (which is the same as my original measurement of strain), am I right? Without resetting, the change in O.cell.getSmallStrain() does not reflect the small strain increment (?) -- You received this question notification because your team yade-users is an answer contact for Yade. _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-users Post to : yade-users@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-users More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp You received this question notification because your team yade-users is an answer contact for Yade. _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-users Post to : yade-users@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-users More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp