Question #700531 on Yade changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/700531
Jérôme Duriez posted a new comment: If one goes back to the analytical derivations of this "Love-Weber" formula, one should see contacts with boundary bodies should probably not be included at all. Since boundary bodies do not belong to the material whose stress we want to compute. It is somewhat discussed in https://www.icevirtuallibrary.com/doi/10.1680/jgeot.15.P.113 (or https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01868739), around Eq. (6) which gives a stress expression that better accounts for boundary effects, in my opinion. (Not implemented in public YADE, at the moment) -- You received this question notification because your team yade-users is an answer contact for Yade. _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-users Post to : yade-users@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-users More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp