For Ceilometer, this was merged in
https://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/ceilometer/commit/?id=36638dde9d88431b7e61cce3835a01b80694f404
and released in juno-2
** Changed in: ceilometer
Status: Triaged => Fix Released
** Changed in: ceilometer
Assignee: Steve Lewis (steve-lewis) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo!
Engineering Team, which is subscribed to neutron.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1306559
Title:
Fix python26 compatibility for RFCSysLogHandler
Status in OpenStack Telemetry (Ceilometer):
Fix Released
Status in Cinder:
Confirmed
Status in OpenStack Image Registry and Delivery Service (Glance):
Confirmed
Status in Orchestration API (Heat):
Fix Released
Status in OpenStack Identity (Keystone):
Confirmed
Status in Murano:
Fix Committed
Status in OpenStack Neutron (virtual network service):
Confirmed
Status in OpenStack Compute (Nova):
Confirmed
Status in Oslo - a Library of Common OpenStack Code:
Fix Released
Status in OpenStack Data Processing (Sahara, ex. Savanna):
Fix Released
Bug description:
Currently used pattern
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/63094/15/openstack/common/log.py (lines
471-479) will fail for Python 2.6.x.
In order to fix the broken Python 2.6.x compatibility, old style explicit
superclass method calls should be used instead.
Here is an example of how to check this for Python v2.7 and v2.6:
import logging.handlers
print type(logging.handlers.SysLogHandler)
print type(logging.Handler)
Results would be:
Python 2.7: <type 'type'>, so super() may be used for
RFCSysLogHandler(logging.handlers.SysLogHandler)
Python 2.6:<type 'classobj'>, so super() may *NOT* be used for
RFCSysLogHandler(logging.handlers.SysLogHandler)
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ceilometer/+bug/1306559/+subscriptions
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team
Post to : yahoo-eng-team@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
