Public bug reported:
hi,
Today neutron supports quota on floating IPs, but for private clouds the
use cases for shared provider networks are increasing. In this area
neutron offers no quota mechanism as far as i can tell, and it is quite
painful since we cannot prevent any project from consuming the whole
provider network. Ideally we would like to have a much more granular
quota system that can handle limits per network, not just a total
summary. Private clouds tend to have many external/shared networks in
different security zones in the enterprise.
- Floating IP quota per external network.
- IP/ports quota per shared provider network.
br,
bjolo
** Affects: neutron
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo!
Engineering Team, which is subscribed to neutron.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1756270
Title:
quota on shared provider networks
Status in neutron:
New
Bug description:
hi,
Today neutron supports quota on floating IPs, but for private clouds
the use cases for shared provider networks are increasing. In this
area neutron offers no quota mechanism as far as i can tell, and it is
quite painful since we cannot prevent any project from consuming the
whole provider network. Ideally we would like to have a much more
granular quota system that can handle limits per network, not just a
total summary. Private clouds tend to have many external/shared
networks in different security zones in the enterprise.
- Floating IP quota per external network.
- IP/ports quota per shared provider network.
br,
bjolo
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1756270/+subscriptions
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team
Post to : yahoo-eng-team@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
