Public bug reported: OpenStack 17.0.8 deployed via OpenStack-Ansible.
We have a compute environment set up with several nova aggregates, across which we wish to configure different cpu allocation ratios. Setting cpu_allocation_ratio as metadata on an aggregate and invoking the AggregateCoreFilter scheduler filter is ineffective and hosts fail to schedule past the default allocation ratio for a given compute node; debug scheduler logs suggest that the ignored compute nodes never even make it into the scheduler filter list, and indeed aren't even listed in the host state updates that scheduler logs. It appears from this single comment I was able to find in another bug report that placement intentionally disregards aggregate metadata, and so excludes compute nodes that might well be capable of scheduling instances: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1742827/comments/13 Manually updating nova.conf on the affected compute nodes to set the intended cpu_allocation_ratio works, but means we need to set up an exception in our OSA config, and that hosts will not automatically obtain new resource allocation ratios when moved between aggregates. Is this intended placement behavior? If so, what's the function of AggregateCoreFilter, and is there a way to restore its pre-placement functionality? ** Affects: nova Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo! Engineering Team, which is subscribed to OpenStack Compute (nova). https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1804125 Title: Nova placement disregards nova aggregate metadata Status in OpenStack Compute (nova): New Bug description: OpenStack 17.0.8 deployed via OpenStack-Ansible. We have a compute environment set up with several nova aggregates, across which we wish to configure different cpu allocation ratios. Setting cpu_allocation_ratio as metadata on an aggregate and invoking the AggregateCoreFilter scheduler filter is ineffective and hosts fail to schedule past the default allocation ratio for a given compute node; debug scheduler logs suggest that the ignored compute nodes never even make it into the scheduler filter list, and indeed aren't even listed in the host state updates that scheduler logs. It appears from this single comment I was able to find in another bug report that placement intentionally disregards aggregate metadata, and so excludes compute nodes that might well be capable of scheduling instances: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1742827/comments/13 Manually updating nova.conf on the affected compute nodes to set the intended cpu_allocation_ratio works, but means we need to set up an exception in our OSA config, and that hosts will not automatically obtain new resource allocation ratios when moved between aggregates. Is this intended placement behavior? If so, what's the function of AggregateCoreFilter, and is there a way to restore its pre-placement functionality? To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1804125/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team Post to : yahoo-eng-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp