** Changed in: neutron
       Status: Opinion => In Progress

** Changed in: neutron
     Assignee: (unassigned) => LIU Yulong (dragon889)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo!
Engineering Team, which is subscribed to neutron.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1609217

Title:
  DVR: dvr router ns should not exist in scheduled DHCP agent nodes

Status in neutron:
  In Progress

Bug description:
  ENV:
  stable/mitaka
  hosts:
  compute1 (nova-compute, l3-agent (dvr), metedate-agent)
  compute2 (nova-compute, l3-agent (dvr), metedate-agent)
  network1 (l3-agent (dvr_snat), metedata-agent, dhcp-agent)
  network2 (l3-agent(dvr_snat), metedata-agent, dhcp-agent)

  How to reproduce? (scenario 1)
  set: dhcp_agents_per_network = 2

  1. create a DVR router:
  neutron router-create --ha False --distributed True test1

  2. Create a network & subnet with dhcp enabled.
  neutron net-create test1
  neutron subnet-create --enable-dhcp test1 --name test1 192.168.190.0/24

  3. Attach the router and subnet
  neutron router-interface-add test1 subnet=test1

  Then the router test1 will exist in both network1 and network2. But in
  the DB routerl3agentbindings, there is only one record for DVR router
  to one l3 agent.

  http://paste.openstack.org/show/547695/

  And for another scenario 2:
  change the network2 node deployment to only run metedata-agent, dhcp-agent.
  Both in the qdhcp-namespace and the VM could ping each other.
  So qrouter-namespace in the not-binded network node is not used, and should 
not exist.

  Code:
  The essential code issue may be DHCP port should not be considered in DVR 
host query.
  https://github.com/openstack/neutron/blob/master/neutron/common/utils.py#L258

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1609217/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team
Post to     : yahoo-eng-team@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to