Dear IESG,
draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-pre-evaluation was submitted for IESG
Evaluation on September 12, 2009. The issues raised by the IESG were
referred to the YAM WG on October 31, 2009 (
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/yam/current/msg00147.html
). Ned Freed posted some comments (
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/yam/current/msg00149.html ) on
November 2, 2009 about RFC 1652 and they have been addressed in
draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-pre-evaluation-02 (
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/yam/current/msg00267.html ).
I believe that RFC 1652 has been thoroughly reviewed for advancement
from Draft to Full Standard by the YAM WG. The results have been
communicated to the IESG in
draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-pre-evaluation-02. The draft was on the
agenda of the IESG for the January 14, 2010 telechat. The YAM WG
requests feedback from the IESG, in particular:
(i) Does the IESG believe the proposed changes are suitable during a
move from Draft to Full Standard?
(ii) Does the IESG believe any other proposed changes are necessary to
satisfy IESG requirements to advance to Full Standard?
(iii) Does the IESG consider the downward references acceptable for a
Full Standard?
Regards,
S. Moonesamy
YAM WG Secretary
_______________________________________________
yam mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yam
