The IESG stated that the proposed changes in
draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-pre-evaluation-02 are suitable [1]. The
next step for RFC 1652bis is to submit an I-D for Working Group
consideration. If the I-D has the consensus of the YAM WG, it will
go through the stages of the normal IETF approval process.
Dave Crocker proposed that the original authors of RFC 1652 can be
maintained as the changes are minor. I suggest that the authors, at
least those that can be contacted, submit a revised I-D that includes
the changes proposed in draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-pre-evaluation-02.
Regards,
S. Moonesamy
YAM WG Secretary
1. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/yam/current/msg00283.html
_______________________________________________
yam mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yam
