Wearing my technical hat, I see no problem with this.
Tony
On 2/18/2010 1:06 PM, Dave CROCKER wrote:
Folks,
The technical details of RFC1652bis must cite MIME AND SMTP, of course.
However it happens that the details do not absolutlely need to cite
RFC5322.
However it strikes me as too strange to have a standard that pertains to
message objects not cite the /message/ standard.
I'd like to have RFC5322 cited at the time MIME is cited, as Ned
suggested privately:
In
particular, a significant portion of the Internet community wishes to
exchange messages in which the content body consists of a MIME
message [RFC2045][RFC2046][RFC 5322] containing arbitrary octet-aligned
material.
Does anyone object?
d/
_______________________________________________
yam mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yam
