I would call this an excellent agenda item for Maastricht.
Some of the documents are quite needy of a rev, irrespective of Russ'
document's outcome. Deciding on the set of documents that make up that
list would be one of the tasks for the WG. One of the interesting thing
about using the pre-evaluation step is that we've forced people to think
through the state of the documents and to get buy-in from the WG for
those changes. None of the pre-eval docs so far have been contentious,
but future ones may be more so.
Tony
On 6/27/2010 6:20 AM, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
[Moving this discussion to YAM and changing the subject.]
I have a more fundamental question for this WG: are people still going
to be interested in updating various email specs if 3 muturity levels
are replaced with 1 or 2?
(I understand that that would mean rechartering, but that is a
relatively minor point.)
_______________________________________________
yam mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yam
