Hi John,
At 05:41 06-05-2011, John C Klensin wrote:
Generally, wfm. Noting that the text is (deliberately) broad
enough to cover body part encoding modifications as well as
those that do integrity checks on headers, so it seems unwise,
and possibly misleading, to single out DKIM. Unless someone
objects, I'll make that "DKIM, PGP, S/MIME or other..." and add
the appropriate citations.
Quoting Section 8:
"Sites MAY modify submissions to ensure compliance with standards and
site policy. This section describes a number of such modifications
that are often considered useful.
NOTE: As a matter of guidance for local decisions to implement
message modification, a paramount rule is to limit such actions to
remedies for specific problems that have clear solutions."
I would like to emphasize the last sentence. It would be helpful if
we can keep the discussion short and sweet. :-)
I would like to avoid a down-ref unless there is a good explanation for it.
Best regards,
-sm
_______________________________________________
yam mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yam
