Hi Mykyta,
I an not copying this reply to the IESG as, in my opinion, it only
increases the amount of messages they receive when the question can
be addressed through the working group mailing list. If you believe
that your question has not been addressed correctly, you can follow
up with the responsible AD, the IESG or any party of your choosing.
At 21:31 04-07-2011, Mykyta Yevstifeyev wrote:
Currently, an active YAM WG document is
draft-ietf-yam-5321bis-smtp-pre-evaluation-05. According to
Datatracker, Alexey brought this to IESG's attention in mid-2010.
Minutes from telechats 6 and 20 May, 2010 show that there were no
objections from IESG members for advancing SMTP to Full Standard
(http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/yam/current/msg00450.html).
This is also what other messages on the list implied. Then, I see,
nothing happened; RFC 5321 is still at Draft. I haven't been
tracking the WG's work then; so could somebody inform whether there
going to be some action with respect to this issue.
Please note that Tony Hansen, one of the YAM WG co-chairs, replied to
the message you mentioned [1]. The minutes for the IETF78 meeting
[2] contains a comment from John Klensin, the editor of 5321bis. The
minutes also covers some of the discussion about process issues.
The working group has been working on 4409bis since then. It's
unlikely that there will be any action on RFC 5321 within the next
month. If you have any more questions the work of the YAM WG, feel
free to post them to this mailing list.
Regards,
S. Moonesamy
1. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/yam/current/msg00451.html
2. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/yam/current/msg00560.html
_______________________________________________
yam mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yam
