On 7/15/2011 2:37 PM, Ned Freed wrote:
So, can/should YAM take it as a work item?
While I agree that this should be dealt with, I don't have an opinion
regarding venue, mostly because I confess to not really understanding
the purpose of either YAM or APPSAWG (the latter I only became aware of
recently) at this point. I do note that EAI is removing a much more
significant restrition (another one that was well-intentioned but
ultimately wrongminded) on encodings of subtypes of message, and this
is being done directly in the EAI WG.
Well, it's really only doing it in the EAI context.
Anyhow, Murray's work item fits into YAM only by starting an entirely new and
different working group.
It fits into APPAWG only if it doesn't really need a full-blown working group.
My guess is that it does not need a full-blown working group.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
yam mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yam
