On 8/22/2011 3:26 PM, S Moonesamy wrote:
The "shepherding AD and the DISCUSSing AD agree that dropping the paragraph in
question is probably the easiest (and perhaps best) course of action". I haven't
discussed the matter with Tony yet. My recommendation is to drop the last
paragraph in Section 8.
If there are any objections, please come up with very convincing arguments. It
was pointed out that the text is not in RFC 4409. The shepherding AD is
"inclined to be *extremely* conservative about changes" and I strongly agree
with him.
This is a pretty classic case of avoiding a problematic Discuss, through an easy
expedient.
Russ' opinion is understandable. I also think it is wrong.
But indeed, this isn't worth debating, since the existing text is extremely
minor, in practical terms.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
yam mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yam
