>> Consider the work to add the clarifications as a down payment >> on the work of any eventual revision, or insurance that a >> revision will be done without forgetting this discussion now. >> Or, if it's worth publishing the errata, it's worth noting >> that it isn't quite right. > > Wfm, noting however that, in my role as keeper of the XML with > comments, etc., I've already marked this change --with a note > that the text isn't quite right-- into the source that would be > used to build 6409bis if Randy and I were to do it. My previous > note was written with that in mind.
OK... then please agree on an exact wording change to the errata report, and I will get the change made. Barry _______________________________________________ yam mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yam
