Thanks Aaron for pointing it out. I didn't see any consensus on HDFS-9924 so I think we should bring it here with broader audiences for more discussions.
I saw several very bad practices here: 1. committer (no need to say who) revert all commits from trunk without making consensus with all related contributors/committers. 2. Someone's comments on feature branch are very misleading... If I didn't remember wrong, feature development doesn't have to go through feature branch which is just an optional process. This creative process of feature branch and branch committer - I believe the intention is trying to accelerate features development but not to slow them down. 3. Someone (again, no need to say who) seems to claim himself as RM for trunk. I don't think we need any RM for trunk. Even for RM of 3.0.0-alpha, I think we need someone else who demonstrates he/she is more responsible, work hardly and carefully and open communication with all community. Only through this, the success of Hadoop in age of 3.0 are guranteed. Thanks, Junping ________________________________ From: Aaron T. Myers <a...@cloudera.com> Sent: Monday, June 06, 2016 4:46 PM To: Junping Du Cc: Andrew Wang; common-...@hadoop.apache.org; hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org; mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org; yarn-dev@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Why there are so many revert operations on trunk? Junping, All of this is being discussed on HDFS-9924. Suggest you follow the conversation there. -- Aaron T. Myers Software Engineer, Cloudera On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 7:20 AM, Junping Du <j...@hortonworks.com<mailto:j...@hortonworks.com>> wrote: Hi Andrew, I just noticed you revert 8 commits on trunk last Friday: HADOOP-13226 HDFS-10430 HDFS-10431 HDFS-10390 HADOOP-13168 HDFS-10390 HADOOP-13168 HDFS-10346 HADOOP-12957 HDFS-10224 And I didn't see you have any comments on JIRA or email discussion before you did this. I don't think we are legally allowed to do this even as committer/PMC member. Can you explain what's your intention to do this? BTW, thanks Nicolas to revert all these "illegal" revert operations. Thanks, Junping
