After some googling, I discovered we need the sign profile to make deploy
work:

mvn deploy -Psign -DskipTests -DskipShading

Updated HowToRelease accordingly.

On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 11:15 AM, Andrew Wang <andrew.w...@cloudera.com>
wrote:

> What I meant is that you can mvn deploy the specific missing files to fix
> up the repo state. Though we should also figure out why the deploy plugin
> didn't pick up the signature files the first time.
>
> Best,
> Andrew
>
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 11:12 AM, Junping Du <j...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>
>> Yes. I did maven deploy in root directory before close the staging
>> repository. If this is the only suspect, I can drop the repository and do
>> mvn deploy again.
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>
>> Junping
>> ------------------------------
>> *From:* Andrew Wang <andrew.w...@cloudera.com>
>> *Sent:* Friday, January 20, 2017 10:48 AM
>> *To:* Junping Du
>> *Cc:* common-...@hadoop.apache.org; hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org;
>> mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org; yarn-dev@hadoop.apache.org
>>
>> *Subject:* Re: [Continued] [Release thread] 2.8.0 release activities
>>
>> You can check the error message by clicking on it, a bunch like this:
>>
>> Missing Signature: '/org/apache/hadoop/hadoop-map
>> reduce-client-jobclient/2.8.0/hadoop-mapreduce-client-jobclient-2.8.0-tests.jar.asc'
>> does not exist for 'hadoop-mapreduce-client-jobclient-2.8.0-tests.jar'.
>>
>> Did you maven deploy all the signature files?
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 2:04 AM, Junping Du <j...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>     I have successfully built the release bit on branch-2.8.0 by
>>> following: https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HowToRelease step by step.
>>> However, when try to close the "Staging Repositories" at Nexus page (
>>> https://repository.apache.org/#stagingRepositories), I found our
>>> repository - orgapachehadoop-1051 cannot be closed due to some signature
>>> validation failed and one Apache rule failed. I never met this problem
>>> before in previous releasing 2.6.3 and 2.6.4. Is this related to our recent
>>> changes on release process/tools (docker based)? Any ideas or thoughts on
>>> how to fix the problem?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Junping
>>>
>>> ________________________________________
>>> From: Junping Du <j...@hortonworks.com>
>>> Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2017 6:46 PM
>>> To: common-...@hadoop.apache.org; hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org;
>>> mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org; yarn-dev@hadoop.apache.org
>>> Cc: Varun Vasudev
>>> Subject: Re: [Continued] [Release thread] 2.8.0 release activities
>>>
>>> According to Varun's offline email, the security fixes has landed on
>>> branch-2, 2.8 and 2.8.0 branch.
>>> I was kicking off a new RC build (RC1), and will publish it for vote
>>> soon. In the mean time, please mark fix version as 2.8.1 for any new
>>> commits landed on branch-2.8, and don't commit anything to branch-2.8.0 at
>>> this moment. Thanks!
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Junping
>>>
>>> ________________________________________
>>> From: Junping Du <j...@hortonworks.com>
>>> Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2017 3:26 PM
>>> To: common-...@hadoop.apache.org; hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org;
>>> mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org; yarn-dev@hadoop.apache.org
>>> Cc: Varun Vasudev
>>> Subject: Re: [Continued] [Release thread] 2.8.0 release activities
>>>
>>> Hi folks,
>>>      In the passed one or two weeks, we found some new blockers get
>>> coming on branch-2.8, like: YARN-6068 (log aggregation get stuck when NM
>>> restart with work preserving enabled) and YARN-6072 (RM unable to start in
>>> secure mode). Both of them are fixed now (YARN-6072 is fixed by Ajith and I
>>> fixed YARN-6068), and I was starting the RC build process since early this
>>> week. As we have significant build tools/process change (docker based)
>>> since 2.8 comparing with 2.6/2.7, it takes me a while to get familiar with
>>> it and finally get a successful build on 2.8.0-RC0 last night.
>>>      I already push RC0 tag into public which is prerequisite step
>>> before RC voting. However,  in the mean while, I was pinged by Varun
>>> Vasudev that there are a known vulnerability issues on container_executor
>>> get identified and discussed in hadoop security email threads - looks like
>>> YARN-5704 fixed part of it, but left part - the privilege escalation via
>>> /proc/self/environ is not fixed yet. So most likely, I have to withdraw our
>>> 2.8.0 RC0 although I haven't announced it public for vote yet. I will wait
>>> this issue get fixed to prepare a new release candidate. As RC0 tag cannot
>>> be reverted after push into apache, our next release candidate will start
>>> from RC1.
>>>     As I mentioned in early email, 2.8.0 is a very big release (2300+
>>> commits since 2.7.3) and I am glad that we are almost there. Thanks
>>> everyone for being patient and contributing our release work. Please let me
>>> know if you have more comments or suggestions.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Junping
>>> ________________________________________
>>> From: Junping Du <j...@hortonworks.com>
>>> Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2017 1:41 AM
>>> To: common-...@hadoop.apache.org; hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org;
>>> mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org; yarn-dev@hadoop.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: [Continued] [Release thread] 2.8.0 release activities
>>>
>>> Hi all Hadoopers,
>>>      I just commit YARN-3866 which is the last blocker for branch-2.8,
>>> so since tomorrow I will kick off process to prepare the first RC for our
>>> 2.8.0 release. This release will include at least 2374 commits that never
>>> landed before in previous 2.x releases. Please check
>>> https://s.apache.org/RW5k for details. There are also 352 fixes marked
>>> in 2.7.1, 2.7.2 and 2.7.3 but not marked with 2.8 (
>>> https://s.apache.org/RKti) that I need to double check all are landed
>>> in branch-2.8 and fix the versions before kicking off the first RC.
>>>      Our progress is slightly behind my estimation weeks ago. However,
>>> considering we just go through holidays and Jenkins cleanup issues linger
>>> on for several projects (YARN, etc.), our achievement here is still great!
>>> Thanks everyone for keep calm and carry on the help for the release. Kudos
>>> to Wangda, Jian, Akira, Jason, Sangjin, Karthik and all for pushing hard on
>>> blockers during this time. Also, special thanks to Vinod and Andrew for
>>> sharing knowledge and practice (include scripts for auto version check) for
>>> releasing effort.
>>>      Will try to prepare RC0 of 2.8 release for vote within this week.
>>> Stay tuned!
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Junping
>>>
>>> ________________________________________
>>> From: Junping Du <j...@hortonworks.com>
>>> Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2016 11:31 AM
>>> To: Akira Ajisaka; common-...@hadoop.apache.org;
>>> hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org; mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org;
>>> yarn-dev@hadoop.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: [Continued] [Release thread] 2.8.0 release activities
>>>
>>> Thanks Akira for reporting this. Actually, HADOOP-2.8-JACC worked well
>>> for several runs before last weekend, but it get failed for latest several
>>> runs, probably affected by recently Jenkins down.
>>> However, from my recent manual kick off, it seems to be good again:
>>> https://builds.apache.org/view/H-L/view/Hadoop/job/Hadoop-2.8-JACC/9/.
>>> I will keep an eye for today's nightly run to see if it back to normal.
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Junping
>>>
>>> ________________________________________
>>> From: Akira Ajisaka <ajisa...@apache.org>
>>> Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2016 12:12 AM
>>> To: common-...@hadoop.apache.org; hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org;
>>> mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org; yarn-dev@hadoop.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: [Continued] [Release thread] 2.8.0 release activities
>>>
>>> Thanks Junping and Andrew!
>>>
>>> HADOOP-2.8-JACC is not working well, so I manually kicked a job to
>>> compare 2.8 with 2.7.3.
>>>
>>> https://builds.apache.org/view/H-L/view/Hadoop/job/Hadoop-tr
>>> unk-JACC/24/artifact/target/compat-check/report.html
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Akira
>>>
>>> On 2016/12/02 2:08, Junping Du wrote:
>>> > Thanks Andrew! That's also a nice suggestion. I already create a
>>> similar job: https://builds.apache.org/view
>>> /H-L/view/Hadoop/job/Hadoop-2.8-JACC/ for 2.8 and kick off several runs
>>> manually. Will monitor incompatible status from there.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Thanks,
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Junping
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > ________________________________
>>> > From: Andrew Wang <andrew.w...@cloudera.com>
>>> > Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2016 4:18 PM
>>> > To: Junping Du
>>> > Cc: Sangjin Lee; common-...@hadoop.apache.org;
>>> hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org; mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org;
>>> yarn-dev@hadoop.apache.org; Vinod Vavilapalli; Jian He; Wangda Tan;
>>> sj...@twitter.com
>>> > Subject: Re: [Continued] [Release thread] 2.8.0 release activities
>>> >
>>> > I recommend giving the JACC report another look. I set up a
>>> parameterized jenkins job which you can trigger manually for branch-2.8:
>>> >
>>> > https://builds.apache.org/view/H-L/view/Hadoop/job/Hadoop-trunk-JACC/
>>> >
>>> > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 4:06 PM, Junping Du <j...@hortonworks.com
>>> <mailto:j...@hortonworks.com>> wrote:
>>> > Hi Sangjin and all,
>>> >
>>> >      That sounds good. If anyone have priority fix to backport ,
>>> please nominate it by following this email thread or ping me on JIRA
>>> directly. And I agree that we should keep in mind that our bar for 2.8
>>> release should be high now as we want to move quickly on this release.
>>> Non-critical fixes can wait for next one.
>>> >
>>> >       Any other comments and suggestions?
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Thanks,
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Junping
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > ________________________________
>>> > From: sjl...@gmail.com<mailto:sjl...@gmail.com> <sjl...@gmail.com
>>> <mailto:sjl...@gmail.com>> on behalf of Sangjin Lee <sj...@apache.org
>>> <mailto:sj...@apache.org>>
>>> > Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2016 3:24 PM
>>> > To: Junping Du
>>> > Cc: common-...@hadoop.apache.org<mailto:common-...@hadoop.apache.org>;
>>> hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org<mailto:hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org>;
>>> mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org<mailto:mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org>;
>>> yarn-dev@hadoop.apache.org<mailto:yarn-dev@hadoop.apache.org>; Vinod
>>> Vavilapalli; Jian He; Wangda Tan; sj...@twitter.com<mailto:sjlee
>>> @twitter.com>
>>> > Subject: Re: [Continued] [Release thread] 2.8.0 release activities
>>> >
>>> > Thanks for picking this up Junping!
>>> >
>>> > I heard on email threads and offline discussions that there may be
>>> interests in porting some fixes from branch-2 to branch-2.8. I still feel
>>> that the bar should be pretty high to do that, but it might be good to have
>>> folks suggest some critical fixes that need to be released sooner. Thoughts?
>>> >
>>> > On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 8:50 PM, Junping Du <j...@hortonworks.com
>>> <mailto:j...@hortonworks.com><mailto:j...@hortonworks.com<mailto:jdu@hor
>>> tonworks.com>>> wrote:
>>> > Hi folks,
>>> >      Per asked by Vinod offline, I would like to continue the effort
>>> to push 2.8 release out in next several weeks. The plan is as following:
>>> >      - We only have 5 blockers and 3 critical issues (
>>> https://s.apache.org/6kwx) so far, and most of them are in good
>>> progress now. I put them all on apache ciwiki (
>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/HADOOP/Hadoop+2.8+Release)
>>> and will do daily monitor and update on these issues in next couple of
>>> weeks.
>>> >      - When all blocker/critical issues are gone (target EOD is Dec.
>>> 10), I will push out all major/minor issues that is open. So if you are
>>> working on some major issues and target for release in 2.8, please keep
>>> track of our release status and your work progress.
>>> >      - I will create RC immediately once our 2.8 target issues are
>>> clean (especially for blocker and critical issues) for voting process.
>>> >
>>> >      I hope we can make it within year 2016, best before Xmas holiday.
>>> And I need help from all of you. :)
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Thanks,
>>> >
>>> > Junping
>>> >
>>> > ________________________________________
>>> > From: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <vino...@apache.org<mailto:vin
>>> o...@apache.org><mailto:vino...@apache.org<mailto:vino...@apache.org>>>
>>> > Sent: Monday, July 25, 2016 2:57 PM
>>> > To: Jian He
>>> > Cc: mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org<mailto:mapreduce-dev@hadoop.
>>> apache.org><mailto:mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org<mailto:ma
>>> preduce-...@hadoop.apache.org>>; yarn-dev@hadoop.apache.org<mailto:
>>> yarn-dev@hadoop.apache.org><mailto:yarn-dev@hadoop.apache.org<mailto:
>>> yarn-dev@hadoop.apache.org>>; hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org<mailto:
>>> hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org><mailto:hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org<mailto:
>>> hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org>>; common-...@hadoop.apache.org<mailto:
>>> common-...@hadoop.apache.org><mailto:common-...@hadoop.apache.org
>>> <mailto:common-...@hadoop.apache.org>>
>>> > Subject: Re: [Release thread] 2.8.0 release activities
>>> >
>>> > Thanks for all that great help moving this release forward, Jian,
>>> Sangjin, Wangda et al! Appreciate it.
>>> >
>>> > The License / Notice fix is finally in. And I pushed out a 2.7.3 RC0
>>> last week.
>>> >
>>> > I only see 9 blocker / critical fixes pending for 2.8.0 -
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12334985. Let’s do this!
>>> >
>>> > Thanks
>>> > +Vinod
>>> >
>>> >> On May 11, 2016, at 6:04 PM, Jian He <j...@hortonworks.com<mailto:jh
>>> e...@hortonworks.com><mailto:j...@hortonworks.com<mailto:j...@hortonworks.com>>>
>>> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> For MapReduce/YARN, I closed a few staled ones. Only 4 jiras needs
>>> attention for 2.8
>>> >>
>>> >> MAPREDUCE-6288
>>> >> YARN-1815
>>> >> YARN-4685
>>> >> YARN-4844
>>> >>
>>> >> The rest are either improvements or long-standing issues and does not
>>> qualify release blocker, IMO.
>>> >> I think we’ll try to get these 4 jiras in asap. The rest will be on
>>> best effort, resolve as much as possible and move them out if not resolved
>>> in time.
>>> >>
>>> >> Jian
>>> >>
>>> >> On May 11, 2016, at 5:37 PM, Wangda Tan <wheele...@gmail.com<mailto:
>>> wheele...@gmail.com><mailto:wheele...@gmail.com<mailto:wheelea
>>> s...@gmail.com>><mailto:wheele...@gmail.com<mailto:wheele...@gmail.com
>>> ><mailto:wheele...@gmail.com<mailto:wheele...@gmail.com>>>> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> Sounds good to me :).
>>> >>
>>> >> Jian and I have looked at all existing 2.8.0 blockers and criticals
>>> today.
>>> >> To me more than half of MR/YARN blockers/criticals of 2.8 should be
>>> moved
>>> >> out. Left comments on these JIRAs asked original owners, plan to
>>> update
>>> >> target version of these JIRAs early next week.
>>> >>
>>> >> Will keep this thread updated.
>>> >>
>>> >> Thanks,
>>> >> Wangda
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 5:06 PM, Sangjin Lee <sj...@apache.org
>>> <mailto:sj...@apache.org><mailto:sj...@apache.org<mailto:
>>> sj...@apache.org>><mailto:sj...@apache.org<mailto:sj...@apache.org
>>> ><mailto:sj...@apache.org<mailto:sj...@apache.org>>>> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> How about this? I'll review the HADOOP/HDFS bugs in that list to come
>>> up
>>> >> with true blockers for 2.8.0 or JIRAs that are close to being ready.
>>> I'll
>>> >> report the list here. Then folks can chime in if you agree
>>> >>
>>> >> Perhaps Wangda, you can go over the YARN/MR bugs. Sound like a plan?
>>> >>
>>> >> Thanks,
>>> >> Sangjin
>>> >>
>>> >> On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 4:26 PM, Wangda Tan <wheele...@gmail.com
>>> <mailto:wheele...@gmail.com><mailto:wheele...@gmail.com<mailto:wheelea
>>> s...@gmail.com>><mailto:wheele...@gmail.com<mailto:wheele...@gmail.com
>>> ><mailto:wheele...@gmail.com<mailto:wheele...@gmail.com>>>> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> +1, we should close such staled JIRAs to avoid doing unnecessary
>>> checks
>>> >> for
>>> >> every releases.
>>> >>
>>> >> I'm working on reviewing YARN/MR critical/blocker patches currently,
>>> it
>>> >> gonna very helpful if someone else can help with reviewing Common/HDFS
>>> >> JIRAs.
>>> >>
>>> >> Thanks,
>>> >> Wangda
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 4:20 PM, Sangjin Lee <sj...@apache.org
>>> <mailto:sj...@apache.org><mailto:sj...@apache.org<mailto:
>>> sj...@apache.org>><mailto:sj...@apache.org<mailto:sj...@apache.org
>>> ><mailto:sj...@apache.org<mailto:sj...@apache.org>>>> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> Where do we stand in terms of closing out blocker/critical issues for
>>> >> 2.8.0? I still see 50 open JIRAs in Vinod's list:
>>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12334985
>>> >>
>>> >> But I see a lot of JIRAs with no patches or very stale patches. It
>>> >> would be
>>> >> a good exercise to come up with the list of JIRAs that we need to
>>> block
>>> >> 2.8.0 for and focus our attention on closing them out. Thoughts?
>>> >>
>>> >> Thanks,
>>> >> Sangjin
>>> >>
>>> >> On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 5:05 AM, Steve Loughran <
>>> ste...@hortonworks.com<mailto:ste...@hortonworks.com><mailto:
>>> ste...@hortonworks.com<mailto:ste...@hortonworks.com>><mailto:
>>> ste...@hortonworks.com<mailto:ste...@hortonworks.com><mailto:
>>> ste...@hortonworks.com<mailto:ste...@hortonworks.com>>>
>>> >>
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On 23 Apr 2016, at 01:24, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <
>>> >> vino...@apache.org<mailto:vino...@apache.org><mailto:vinodkv
>>> @apache.org<mailto:vino...@apache.org>><mailto:vino...@apache.org
>>> <mailto:vino...@apache.org><mailto:vino...@apache.org<mailto:
>>> vino...@apache.org>>>>
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> We are not converging - there’s still 58 more. I need help from the
>>> >> community in addressing / review 2.8.0 blockers. If folks can start
>>> >> with
>>> >> reviewing Patch available tickets, that’ll be great.
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> I'm still doing the s3a stuff, other people testing and reviewing this
>>> >> stuff welcome.
>>> >>
>>> >> in particular, I could do with others playing with this patch of mine,
>>> >> which adds counters and things into S3a, based on the azure
>>> >> instrumentation
>>> >>
>>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13028
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-dev-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org<mailto:
>>> yarn-dev-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org><mailto:
>>> yarn-dev-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org<mailto:yarn-dev-
>>> unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org>>
>>> > For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-dev-h...@hadoop.apache.org
>>> <mailto:yarn-dev-h...@hadoop.apache.org><mailto:yarn-dev-he
>>> l...@hadoop.apache.org<mailto:yarn-dev-h...@hadoop.apache.org>>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: mapreduce-dev-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
>>> <mailto:mapreduce-dev-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org><mailto:
>>> mapreduce-dev-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org<mailto:
>>> mapreduce-dev-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org>>
>>> > For additional commands, e-mail: mapreduce-dev-h...@hadoop.apache.org
>>> <mailto:mapreduce-dev-h...@hadoop.apache.org><mailto:m
>>> apreduce-dev-h...@hadoop.apache.org<mailto:mapreduce-dev-
>>> h...@hadoop.apache.org>>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-dev-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-dev-h...@hadoop.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-dev-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-dev-h...@hadoop.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-dev-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-dev-h...@hadoop.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-dev-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-dev-h...@hadoop.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-dev-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-dev-h...@hadoop.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-dev-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-dev-h...@hadoop.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to