+1

On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 8:50 PM Akira Ajisaka <aajis...@apache.org> wrote:

> +1
>
> -Akira
>
> On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 4:55 AM Ayush Saxena <ayush...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 for marking 2.8 EOL
> >
> > -Ayush
> >
> > > On 03-Mar-2020, at 12:18 AM, Wei-Chiu Chuang <weic...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > I am sorry I forgot to start a VOTE thread.
> > >
> > > This is the "official" vote thread to mark branch-2.8 End of Life. This
> > is
> > > based on the following thread and the tracking jira (HADOOP-16880
> > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16880>).
> > >
> > > This vote will run for 7 days and conclude on March 9th (Mon) 11am PST.
> > >
> > > Please feel free to share your thoughts.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Weichiu
> > >
> > >> On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 10:28 AM Wei-Chiu Chuang <
> weic...@cloudera.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Looking at the EOL policy wiki:
> > >>
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/HADOOP/EOL+%28End-of-life%29+Release+Branches
> > >>
> > >> The Hadoop community can still elect to make security update for
> EOL'ed
> > >> releases.
> > >>
> > >> I think the EOL is to give more clarity to downstream applications
> (such
> > >> as HBase) the guidance of which Hadoop release lines are still active.
> > >> Additionally, I don't think it is sustainable to maintain 6 concurrent
> > >> release lines in this big project, which is why I wanted to start this
> > >> discussion.
> > >>
> > >> Thoughts?
> > >>
> > >>> On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 10:22 AM Sunil Govindan <sun...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> Hi Wei-Chiu
> > >>>
> > >>> Extremely sorry for the late reply here.
> > >>> Cud u pls help to add more clarity on defining what will happen for
> > >>> branch-2.8 when we call EOL.
> > >>> Does this mean that, no more release coming out from this branch, or
> > some
> > >>> more additional guidelines?
> > >>>
> > >>> - Sunil
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 11:47 PM Wei-Chiu Chuang
> > >>> <weic...@cloudera.com.invalid> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> This thread has been running for 7 days and no -1.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Don't think we've established a formal EOL process, but to publicize
> > the
> > >>>> EOL, I am going to file a jira, update the wiki and post the
> > >>> announcement
> > >>>> to general@ and user@
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 1:40 PM Dinesh Chitlangia <
> > >>> dineshc....@gmail.com>
> > >>>> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> Thanks Wei-Chiu for initiating this.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> +1 for 2.8 EOL.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 10:48 PM Akira Ajisaka <
> aajis...@apache.org>
> > >>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> Thanks Wei-Chiu for starting the discussion,
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> +1 for the EoL.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> -Akira
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 4:59 PM Ayush Saxena <ayush...@gmail.com>
> > >>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Thanx Wei-Chiu for initiating this
> > >>>>>>> +1 for marking 2.8 EOL
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> -Ayush
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> On 17-Feb-2020, at 11:14 PM, Wei-Chiu Chuang <
> > >>> weic...@apache.org>
> > >>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> The last Hadoop 2.8.x release, 2.8.5, was GA on September 15th
> > >>>> 2018.
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> It's been 17 months since the release and the community by and
> > >>>> large
> > >>>>>> have
> > >>>>>>>> moved up to 2.9/2.10/3.x.
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> With Hadoop 3.3.0 over the horizon, is it time to start the EOL
> > >>>>>>> discussion
> > >>>>>>>> and reduce the number of active branches?
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-dev-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
> > >>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
> > >>> common-dev-h...@hadoop.apache.org
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: mapreduce-dev-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: mapreduce-dev-h...@hadoop.apache.org
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to