+1

On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 8:32 AM anu engineer <anu.engin...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1
> —Anu
>
> > On May 13, 2020, at 12:53 AM, Elek, Marton <e...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > 
> >
> > I would like to start a discussion to make a separate Apache project for
> Ozone
> >
> >
> >
> > ### HISTORY [1]
> >
> > * Apache Hadoop Ozone development started on a feature branch of Hadoop
> repository (HDFS-7240)
> >
> > * In the October of 2017 a discussion has been started to merge it to
> the Hadoop main branch
> >
> > * After a long discussion it's merged to Hadoop trunk at the March of
> 2018
> >
> > * During the discussion of the merge, it was suggested multiple times to
> create a separated project for the Ozone. But at that time:
> >    1). Ozone was tightly integrated with Hadoop/HDFS
> >    2). There was an active plan to use Block layer of Ozone (HDDS or
> HDSL at that time) as the block level of HDFS
> >    3). The community of Ozone was a subset of the HDFS community
> >
> > * The first beta release of Ozone was just released. Seems to be a good
> time before the first GA to make a decision about the future.
> >
> >
> >
> > ### WHAT HAS BEEN CHANGED
> >
> > During the last years Ozone became more and more independent both at the
> community and code side. The separation has been suggested again and again
> (for example by Owen [2] and Vinod [3])
> >
> >
> >
> > From COMMUNITY point of view:
> >
> >
> >  * Fortunately more and more new contributors are helping Ozone.
> Originally the Ozone community was a subset of HDFS project. But now a
> bigger and bigger part of the community is related to Ozone only.
> >
> >  * It seems to be easier to _build_ the community as a separated project.
> >
> >  * A new, younger project might have different practices (communication,
> commiter criteria, development style) compared to old, mature project
> >
> >  * It's easier to communicate (and improve) these standards in a
> separated projects with clean boundaries
> >
> >  * Separated project/brand can help to increase the adoption rate and
> attract more individual contributor (AFAIK it has been seen in Submarine
> after a similar move)
> >
> > * Contribution process can be communicated more easily, we can make
> first time contribution more easy
> >
> >
> >
> > From CODE point of view Ozone became more and more independent:
> >
> >
> > * Ozone has different release cycle
> >
> > * Code is already separated from Hadoop code base
> (apache/hadoop-ozone.git)
> >
> > * It has separated CI (github actions)
> >
> > * Ozone uses different (more strict) coding style (zero toleration of
> unit test / checkstyle errors)
> >
> > * The code itself became more and more independent from Hadoop on Maven
> level. Originally it was compiled together with the in-tree latest Hadoop
> snapshot. Now it depends on released Hadoop artifacts (RPC,
> Configuration...)
> >
> > * It starts to use multiple version of Hadoop (on client side)
> >
> > * Volume of resolved issues are already very high on Ozone side (Ozone
> had slightly more resolved issues than HDFS/YARN/MAPREDUCE/COMMON all
> together in the last 2-3 months)
> >
> >
> > Summary: Before the first Ozone GA release, It seems to be a good time
> to discuss the long-term future of Ozone. Managing it as a separated TLP
> project seems to have more benefits.
> >
> >
> > Please let me know what your opinion is...
> >
> > Thanks a lot,
> > Marton
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [1]: For more details, see:
> https://github.com/apache/hadoop-ozone/blob/master/HISTORY.md
> >
> > [2]:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/0d0253f6e5fa4f609bd9b917df8e1e4d8848e2b7fdb3099b730095e6%40%3Cprivate.hadoop.apache.org%3E
> >
> > [3]:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/8be74421ea495a62e159f2b15d74627c63ea1f67a2464fa02c85d4aa%40%3Chdfs-dev.hadoop.apache.org%3E
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: ozone-dev-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: ozone-dev-h...@hadoop.apache.org
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-dev-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-dev-h...@hadoop.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to