[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-392?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13653143#comment-13653143
 ] 

Bikas Saha commented on YARN-392:
---------------------------------

I am fine with a boolean because the client can wait for the same timeout and 
then unset the flag using a new resource request, if it wants to. We need to 
have a test that verifies this behavior.

About the last patch
How about disableAllocation as an alternative name?

Why is there a disable node local request? Node-Specific==(Disable-rack+*). 
Rack-specific==(Disable-*) Where does Disable-node make sense?
{code}
+        if (localRequest != null && localRequest.getNoAllocateAt()) {
+          continue;
+        }
{code}

The two checks seem to be different. One checks for containers > 0 while the 
other does not. Dont know if that matters in the fair scheduler?
{code}
+        if (rackLocalRequest != null && rackLocalRequest.getNoAllocateAt()) {
+          continue;
+        }
 
         if (rackLocalRequest != null && rackLocalRequest.getNumContainers() != 0
{code}

I dont see rack info being set anywhere. Shouldnt the nodes end up getting 
rack==default-rack. If thats true then sending a rack request for rack=rack1 is 
probably not testing what was intended, right?
{code}
+    ResourceRequest rackRequest = createResourceRequest(1024, "rack1", 1, 1, 
true);
{code}

As discussed earlier in this jira, its not possible to mix strict and 
non-strict allocations at the same priority. I dont see that being 
checked/enforced anywhere. Similarly, it does not look like we can mix 
strict-node and strict-rack at the same priority.

Are capacity scheduler changes not targeted for this patch?
                
> Make it possible to schedule to specific nodes without dropping locality
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-392
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-392
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Bikas Saha
>            Assignee: Sandy Ryza
>         Attachments: YARN-392-1.patch, YARN-392-2.patch, YARN-392-2.patch, 
> YARN-392-2.patch, YARN-392.patch
>
>
> Currently its not possible to specify scheduling requests for specific nodes 
> and nowhere else. The RM automatically relaxes locality to rack and * and 
> assigns non-specified machines to the app.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to